CO Emissions Reduction

Home Forums altairstrickland-displayad FCC Process CO Emissions Reduction

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #2987
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Has anyone used CO Oxidizing catalyst for reducing carbon monoxide emissions in FCC Flue Gas?  If so, please discuss concerns and issues and problem resolutions.

    • #5982
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      CO combustion promoter have been used extensively for several decades now.

      Historically the CO combustion promoter has been Platinum (Pt) based.

      The rule of thumb is 1 ppm of Pt in the circulating inventory for continuous control.
      Also, the rule of thumb has been to maintain the delta temperature between the
      regenerator bed to the cyclone inlets at less than 35 to 40 deg F. However, that
      control strategy has changed somewhat over the last few years to “just keep
      the cyclones under 1400 deg F.”

      The problem or issue with utilizing Pt based CO combustion promoters has been
      a significant increase in NOx emissions.

      Therefore, there has been the development and utilization of a non-Pt based CO
      combustion promoter, usually Pallidium (Pd) based. The issue of increased
      NOx emissions has been retarded with the Pd based promoters.
      However, Pd based promoters have been more expensive and have been
      less effective (agressive) at controlling immediate high levels of after-burn.
      Pd CO combustion promoters have proven to be more effective as a
      long-term control modulator. Then the Pt based additive would be
      used/employed for “emergency” situations.

      Ken Peccatiello
      Ken@PeccatielloEngineering.com
      Ken@catcracking.local

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
2923 Topics 3878 Replies

Coking forum

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur aliquam venenatis venenatis. Vestibulum tempus malesuada rhoncus.

Open forum